A new web-service for xPeer®, the deep-reasoning agent developed on-top of KNOWDYN's project AllMind which is capable of understanding epistemological frameworks and scientific workflows.
xPeerd aims to reform the peer review process by raising the quality bar and empowering the scientific community to fight predatory practices, detect and expose fraudulent research, and ensure reproducibility of published work.
Traditional peer review is plagued by inefficiencies, bias, and delays, with some manuscripts taking months to review. xPeerd addresses these challenges with advanced AI tools.
xPeerd is owned by KNOWDYN and is part of the KNOWDYN City project.
xPeerd’s AI is designed specifically for academic peer review, focusing on ethical, transparent, and context-specific evaluations that prioritize academic rigor over generic AI functionality
xPeerd supports a wide range of academic disciplines, including sciences, engineering, social sciences, and more.
Yes, users can interact with xPeerd’s AI during the session, refining the feedback and getting specific insights.
Absolutely. Users can choose between in-depth reviews, quick evaluations, or customized feedback tailored to journal requirements.
Yes, xPeerd’s AI models are equipped to detect signs of fraudulent research or predatory practices, ensuring the integrity of the peer review process.
By leveraging cross-disciplinary AI models, xPeerd adapts to the unique methodologies and terminologies of various academic fields, from STEM to humanities.
xPeerd ensures transparent, unbiased, and rapid peer review for conference submissions, bolstering your event’s reputation and credibility
Yes, the platform adopts agentic approach to user experience and instructed to maintain with step-by-step guides to ensure ease of use for all researchers.
xPeerd offers responsive customer support to resolve any problems quickly.
Yes, review reports can be shared with co-authors, journal editors, or preprint servers using the platform’s share feature.
xPeerd handles large-scale peer reviews for conferences, ensuring fairness and methodological rigor while freeing organizers to focus on event delivery.
Yes, xPeerd’s review process highlights gaps in clarity, offering actionable recommendations to improve readability and presentation.
For every review credit used, xPeerd plants a tree, supporting environmental restoration alongside advancing academic excellence
Yes, xPeerd offers tailored pricing plans for institutions and publishers to facilitate large-scale adoption.
With free starting credits and low per-review costs, xPeerd is accessible to researchers at all levels.
Yes, xPeerd is accessible to researchers worldwide and offers multilingual support to cater to diverse communities.
xPeerd only processes session data, such as manuscript content and user inputs, and deletes everything after the session ends.
The platform employs end-to-end encryption and temporary file processing to protect user confidentiality.
Yes, xPeerd provides unique live URLs for review sessions.
Yes, all submissions are anonymized to eliminate bias and ensure evaluations are based solely on the merit of the work.
Absolutely. xPeerd offers complete confidentiality and compliance with ethical standards for managing conference submissions
By automating repetitive tasks, xPeerd reduces the workload on human reviewers, allowing them to focus on critical assessments.
Yes, xPeerd's AI models are designed to understand and evaluate complex interdisciplinary manuscripts.
By highlighting missing methodologies and dataset details, xPeerd ensures manuscripts meet high standards of reproducibility.
By implementing transparent and rigorous peer review, xPeerd positions conferences as leaders in academic integrity and innovation.
xPeerd’s initiative to plant a tree for every review credit aligns with global efforts to combat deforestation while advancing science.
Yes, xPeerd provides constructive feedback tailored to researchers’ needs, helping them strengthen their manuscripts and build confidence
xPeerd optimizes workflows for STEM publishers by providing comprehensive, bias-free reviews and reducing operational inefficiencies.
Publishers gain access to AI tools aligned with high ethical standards, ensuring transparent peer reviews and enhancing trust in their journals.
Yes, xPeerd offers tailored solutions for publishers to integrate into their unique workflows, enhancing review precision and efficiency
xPeerd partners with publishers to streamline editorial workflows, reduce delays, and enhance review quality.
Eligible researchers can apply by completing at least one xPeerd review and submitting an application with proof of expertise.
Yes, xPeerd supports post-publication reviews, helping authors address critiques and improve their work even after publication.
Yes, the platform advocates for transparency and open access, ensuring equitable opportunities for researchers.
xPeerd identifies and flags fabricated science, tampered methodologies, and fraudulent assimilation of results.
Yes, xPeerd adheres to strict ethical guidelines, avoiding over-automation and prioritizing human judgment where necessary.
By reducing the time and resources spent on traditional peer review processes, xPeerd supports a more sustainable research ecosystem.
xPeerd anonymizes submissions and uses AI models free from biases, ensuring reviews are based on the research’s merit.
By adhering to strict ethical mandates, xPeerd ensures accountability, transparency, and inclusivity while preserving human oversight in the review process.
xPeerd’s rigorous peer review eliminates biased or fake research submissions, ensuring conferences maintain their credibility and academic value
Sign up on the xPeerd website, claim your free credits, and upload your manuscript to begin the review process.
Yes, xPeerd offers live demonstrations and training sessions for both individual researchers and institutional teams.
Yes, xPeerd’s feedback tools can be used for a variety of documents, including theses and grant applications.