What is wrong with peer review?
The peer-review process, a crucial component of academic publishing, is facing significant challenges that threaten its effectiveness and integrity. With over 3 million scholarly articles published annually across more than 32,000 journals, the system is under increasing strain to maintain quality and credibility.
Reviewer Fatigue and Declining Participation
68M
Annual Review Hours
Collective time spent on peer reviews annually
40%
Completion Rate
Invited reviewers who accept and complete reviews
71%
Decline Rate
Researchers who decline review invitations
The peer-review process demands a substantial time investment globally each year. Despite this, inefficiencies persist with only about 40% of invited reviewers accepting and completing their reviews. The majority of researchers decline review invitations, often due to lack of expertise or time constraints. This declining participation exacerbates the challenge of securing qualified reviewers, leading to delays and potential compromises in review quality.
Editor Workloads and Systemic Pressures
Editor Workload
Editors handle an average of 83.3 papers and respond to 416.7 correspondences annually. The increasing volume of submissions intensifies these pressures, making it more challenging to manage the peer-review process effectively.
Pandemic Impact
The COVID-19 pandemic has further strained the system, with a surge in manuscript submissions and a simultaneous decline in the availability of reviewers, leading to significant delays and bottlenecks.
Emergence of Fraudulent Practices
1
Fake Peer Reviews
Instances of fraudulent peer reviews have been uncovered, undermining the integrity of the process.
2
Paper Mills
Proliferation of entities producing fraudulent research papers has led to a rise in retractions.
3
2023 Retractions
Over 10,000 research papers were retracted due to issues such as peer-review fraud and sham papers.
These fraudulent practices threaten the trust in the academic publishing system and highlight vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
The Need for Systemic Reform
1
2
3
4
5
1
Comprehensive Reforms
2
Reviewer Compensation
3
Enhanced Transparency
4
Rigorous Training
5
Leveraging Technology
To ensure the sustainability and reliability of the peer-review system, comprehensive reforms are necessary. Potential solutions include compensating reviewers, enhancing transparency, implementing more rigorous training, and leveraging technology to detect fraud. Innovative approaches like open peer review and post-publication review are also being explored to address these issues.
Copyright © KNOWDYN. All rights reserved.